Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twtxt
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Twtxt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recentism. App created in February 2016, barely over a month ago. Most references are to Github, hardly a reliable source. Alexf(talk) 14:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nom. -- Alexf(talk) 14:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON -- though it might be wp:crystalballing to estimate better luck in the future. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as use/relevancy of decentral applications hard to measure by definition. --Wikingr (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The Linux Magazine source is something, but there's just not enough coverage yet. No objection to Incubating as a draft for now. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.